首页> 外文OA文献 >Monetary union, even higher integration, or back to national currencies?
【2h】

Monetary union, even higher integration, or back to national currencies?

机译:货币联盟,甚至更高的一体化,还是回归本国货币?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article quantifies the welfare differences among a monetary union, flexible exchange rates (economic disintegration) and a monetary plus fiscal transfer union (higher economic integration). The vehicle of analysis is a medium-scale New Keynesian DSGE model consisting of two heterogeneous countries. The model is solved using data from Germany and Italy. Our solutions imply that a switch to flexible exchange rates and independent monetary policies would have negligible welfare implications. A similar result applies when we add interregional fiscal transfers as insurance. By contrast, the addition of fiscal transfers as redistribution has non-trivial implications and these depend crucially on whether such one-sided transfers trigger moral hazard behavior.
机译:本文量化了货币联盟,灵活汇率(经济崩溃)和货币加财政转移联盟(较高的经济一体化)之间的福利差异。分析的工具是由两个不同国家组成的中等规模的新凯恩斯主义DSGE模型。该模型使用德国和意大利的数据进行求解。我们的解决方案意味着,转向灵活的汇率和独立的货币政策将对福利产生微不足道的影响。当我们添加区域间财政转移支付作为保险时,也会产生类似的结果。相比之下,将财政转移支付作为重新分配具有不平凡的影响,而这些影响主要取决于这种单方面转移是否会引发道德风险行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号